To Block or Not to Block: U.S. Supreme Court Issues A Free Speech Decision Regarding Social Media

To Block or Not to Block: U.S. Supreme Court Issues A Free Speech Decision Regarding Social Media

 

 On Friday, March 15, 2024, the United States Supreme Court weighed in on the ability of public officials to block critics on social media accounts.

In Lindke v. Freed, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court established a test or factors to consider when determining if a public official had a right to block critics on social media accounts. The record of the case showed that Freed maintained a private Facebook account, which was updated to include his appointment to city manager of Port Huron, Michigan in 2014. He utilized his Facebook account to post about his personal life, information related to his job, soliciting feedback on issues of concern, and communicating matters from other areas of the city. Freed would comment to posts on his account and occasionally deleted posts he considered “derogatory” or “stupid.”
During the COVID-19 pandemic, community member Lindke posted his displeasure with how the city was handling the pandemic on Freed’s Facebook page. Freed deleted these posts and eventually blocked Lindke from commenting on Freed’s Facebook page. Lindke sued alleging Freed violated his First Amendment Rights.

In its decision, the U.S. Supreme Court set a standard that a public official’s social media activity could be considered state action only if the official:
(1) possessed actual authority to speak on the State’s behalf, and
(2) purported to exercise that authority when he spoke on social media.

The Court clearly indicated “[w]hile public officials can act on behalf of the State, they are also private citizens with their own constitutional rights.” The Court provided guidance on what public officials could do to do to avoid having their social media pages, and the actions on the same, called into legal question.

Board of Education members and other public employees can assist by making matters clear to the community and courts (if challenged) through:
1. Considering single-use social media (only an official page and only a personal page). The Court highlighted the concern with “mixed-use” social media.
2. Clearly designating social media pages as personal or official.
3. Consider a disclaimer (e.g., “the views expressed are strictly my own”) to create a presumption that posts are personal.
4. Review of policies and actions (i.e. past practice) to consider who is responsible for the official messaging of the board of education.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On the Call: Methodology

Just when you think you have earned the scout badge in IEP writing, a parent asks for the methodology which can feel like pouring water on the perfect campfire you just built! In this episode, Erin and Jeremy discuss how methodology can be selected and the requirements for including it in the IEP under IDEA. The discussion includes a case from Maine where a District learned a hard lesson when it failed to include methodology in the IEP and adjust it based on a lack of progress. They highlight the importance of reviewing data and actively listening when requests come in so you and the team successfully take home all the badges.  

You can also listen here or wherever you get your podcasts. Look for new episodes on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month.

On the Call: Outside Placements and Stay Put

Determining a District’s obligations under IDEA when a student is removed from their outplacement facility can have you feeling like you’re balancing on a tightrope between the space-time continuum. Erin and Jeremy discuss the blackletter law related to LRE and Stay Put when this type of situation arises. They share the details of a recent COVID-era case from Washington D.C. where the court determined Stay Put didn’t apply since the District did not make the change and the staff acted in good faith to attempt to locate a new facility. The discussion includes suggestions for building strong communications with outside placements and how to balance safety concerns and the risks of non-compliance so you will be able to fly smoothly across the continuum

You can also listen here or wherever you get your podcasts. Look for new episodes on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month.

On the Call: Shortened Day

It’s a great day when parents and the District are in agreement! Jeremy and Erin follow-up on a conference call where the team wants to be sure the use of a shortened day is compliant with all the special education laws and regulations including FAPE, LRE, and 504. They discuss the importance of making sure everyone at the table has a shared understanding of the child’s disability that is driving the need for a shortened day. The discussion also includes a formal complaint investigation from Indiana where the District’s decision to shorten the school day based on the student’s behavior was determined to be appropriate.

You can also listen here or wherever you get your podcasts. Look for new episodes on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month.

On the Call: Virtual Meetings

In this episode, Jeremy and Erin tackle the virtual meeting roadblocks that can cause your team to detour when trying to navigate good parent participation and adherence to the guidelines. They share the details of a recent case from Indiana where a parent used the virtual meeting platform to hinder specific district staff from participating. They share several suggestions to help keep the technology user-friendly and maintain a productive meeting for all involved so everyone “CAN HEAR YOU NOW!” 

You can also listen here or wherever you get your podcasts. Look for new episodes on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month.